The BBC reported that Sarah Palin will be “unlikely to co-operate” with the Alaskan Legislature’s investigation into whether she improperly used her office to carry out a personal vendetta against her former brother-in-law.
From the article:
McCain campaign spokesman Mr O’Callaghan said he did not know if Mr Palin would challenge the subpoena, issued on Friday, requiring his cooperation.
However, Mrs Palin was “unlikely to co-operate” with the inquiry “so long as it remains tainted and run by partisan individuals that have a pre-determined conclusion”, the AFP news agency quotes him as saying.
Mrs Palin has not been ordered to testify but Mr Branchflower has said he hopes to speak to her about Mr Monegan’s dismissal.
Of course, the investigation began before Palin was tapped to be John Sidney McCain, III’s running mate, and the request for subpoenas was passed by a bipartisan committee, with one Republican joining the two Democratic Party members in agreeing to forward the subpoenas on to the full legislature, so to call it partisan is a bit misleading. But we’ve come to expect that from the Bush/McCain political machine.
Sarah Palin lacks integrity and honesty. And if she does, what does that say about the judgment of the man who chose her to be his running mate, John McCain?
If you believe in her honesty, then have I got a bridge to nowhere to sell you.
You must log in to post a comment.